Ace on Tech

My Coverage on Windows 7 (experimental)

Blog

The Opera Browser Revisited

Update: DrLaunch mentioned a good link which compares the Top 150 Firefox extensions to Opera’s widgets, here.

I’ve been a Firefox user for a long time. In fact, I think I was there from the very beginning, back when it was still called Phoenix (in alpha stage). It’s been my browser of preference for years and it’s most unlikely I’ll ever switch to anything else. Although, lately some issues with Firefox 2 have been cropping up, like frequent crashes under Windows Vista and lagging performance in Ubuntu (7.10). Naturally, let us not forget the memory leakage galore.

Opera

Why would someone still hang on to something like this? I guess I’m just set in my ways when about web browsing. And so are so many others with Internet Explorer, I reckon. Opera, on the other hand, has always triggered my curiosity. It’s seems so underexposed, while it does look like a solid piece of software. I’ve tried using it in the past, but dismissed it because of the embedded ads. Recently, the application was made ad-free, hoping to attract more users.

I’ve tested the latest stable build of Opera (version 9.24) on Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon (7.10).

Installation

Opera Ubuntu Install 4

The nice thing about Ubuntu Linux is that it allows you to install applications from its central repository, excluding the need to look for an installer-file on the internet. If you wanted to do this, of course, you could. I just picked the easy way out and installed it via the Synaptic package manager. It didn’t take much to install Opera, of course, so it was up and running quickly.

At first glance

The compact layout of the UI leaves a lot of room for actual browsing and might give the wrong impression. Opera is an impressive browser and includes: tabbed browsing (Opera was the pioneer in the field), integrated search, extensions, bittorrent-support and many less significant - yet nice to have - features.

Slow AJAX. CPU hog?

Opera claims its browser is the fastest around, but frankly, I wasn’t able to measure any substantial difference. It didn’t load web pages significantly faster, nor did it slower. I did find it to run AJAX a heck of a lot slower than Firefox or even Internet Explorer. Flickr.com’s “Organize”-pages executed nastily slowly. In the end I close the whole shebang down and went back to Firefox in order to get my album organized on Flickr.

While the laptop I’m testing this on is fairly recent and decent (Dell XPS M1710 — September 2007), I started noticing heavy CPU loads (50% and more) after a few minutes for no apparent reason.
Customization

In contrast with Firefox’ infinite supply of extensions, Opera is gravely lacking. To remedy this, Opera put in the effort of implementing something called Widgets. Yes, like OS X’ and even Vista’s Gadgets — but tailored for web browsing. I’m not sure anyone needs even more gadgets, for I doubt their usefulness in the long run.

Widgets are the only means of customization and Opera’s Community site for Widgets offers counterparts to many of Firefox’ popular extensions. Yet, in my opinion, they’re lacking due to their form-factor: floating about on your desktop like.. widgets. Only at reduced window size would you be able to utilize the gadgets, for they would otherwise obstruct your view on what’s happening on the webpages. They just don’t seem to do what you’d expect them to.

Opera 11

The high resolution (1920 * 1200) on my screen enables me to scale down the browsing window and display widgets side-by-side. I’m pretty comfortable working this way, but I know many people prefer full-screen browsing or just aren’t equipped with enough screen real-estate. Bummer (I like Firefox’ extensions better).

Extra tab functionality (see figure above)

Apart from it being laden with keyboard shortcuts, it’s also got a nifty feature called the “Speed Dial”. It works like the similarly named function on a cellphone: assign a number to a certain site and use a keyboard shortcut to access it quickly in a new tab (mapped to CTRL+[number] by default). Neat.

Sadly enough, due to Opera’s crippled AJAX support, pre-fetching of websites is snail-paced (as seen in picture above). I couldn’t even get Google Reader to work from the speed dial.

Just the average browser after all

All in all, Opera’s Browser is a decent one that’ll do the job just like IE and Firefox will. While I must admit some issues may be Linux-based (I didn’t perform any tests on Windows), 50% CPU load for a mere browser is unacceptable to me. Don’t get me wrong though: I like Opera. I just can’t part with Firefox (yet?).

Opera is a power-user browser — to some extent. A real power user wants extensions, though.

Opera Website

My tweets for 2007-11-30

My tweets for 2007-11-29

My tweets for 2007-11-28

Today’s interesting stories (Monday 19-nov-2007)

Quiet day on the Net

It’s been a quiet day for my RSS-reader! I usually drop down in front of it and get drowned in stuff, but not today. I guess tomorrow won’t be much better, either.

See you on Monday.

‘The Exorcist’ by William Peter Blatty Mini-Review

The Exorcist by Stephen King‘The Exorcist’ is an epic horror story written by William Peter Blatty and made it to the silver screen back in the seventies (1973 to be exact). It was long marked as the horror movie and was highly ranked. Even up to the present day IMDB.com’s users give it a generous rating of 8 out of 10. The movie won 2 Oscars initially and got another subsequent 12 (different) awards in the years thereafter. Besides actual awards ‘The Exorcist’ also received a whopping total of 14 nominations. Feel free check out this extensive list over at IMDB. Some 34 years later, this movie is still a renowned success, be it a bit less spectacular when considering the special effects (one might even say it’s become a bit pathetic), by today’s standards. Nevertheless, provided you can appreciate the horror-genre, I would say it’s a must-see.

I started reading this book as biased as you must be right now, doubting whether I wouldn’t constantly be badgered by the artificial-looking special effects used in the original movie. It’s an honest assumption, but none of it applied.

  • Author: William Peter BlattyAudible
  • Narrator: William Peter Blatty
  • Publisher: Phoenix Audio
  • Year of publication: 1999
  • Audible Pricing USD: $25.20 (€17.48) or 1 credit
  • Running time: 10 hours and 33 minutes
  • Audible Offering for this book

William Peter BlattyGood narration. The story kicks off with a gloomy musical score, accompanied by the amazingly apt narration of William Peter Blatty himself. Many writers throw a shot at narrating their own books and results vary. Some voices are just less appropriate for out-loud reading, I guess. Often times, their inability will tick you off and make you stop listening, while the book itself usually isn’t that bad. Blatty tells his story with stunning intonation and makes you feel there. After a few minutes, you’ll be convinced of the apparent authenticity of the story and you’ll be plunged in till the very end.

About the author at Wikipedia.

Storyline. I think it’s fair to say that the majority of the casual television-watching population has seen ‘The Exorcist’. Probably even more than once. So I needn’t describe the whole plot in grave detail, as I would usually do with book reviews…

The Exorcist PicChris McNeil is a successful Hollywood actor, lives in Georgetown and has a 12-year old daughter. One day, Regan (the daughter) became inexplicably ill. She began showing signs of some psychological disorder, diverting into multiple disorders and supernatural strength. Regan claimed she was the demon ‘Pazuzu’, and even the devil himself. An array of doctors and shrinks passed the revue, yet none was able to indicate what disease exactly she’s suffering from, let alone could come up with a cure.

In utter despair, the atheistic Chris turned to the notion of demonic possession. For Rags (her pet name for Regan) was showing all symptoms of it and the situation was getting more earnest as the days passed.

Father Damien Karras, a priest in constant battle with his faith, became close to Chris and helped her find an exorcist. Rare as they were, Lankester Merrin stepped up to cast out the demon…

Overall rating: 13 out of 15
I found ‘The Exorcist” to be a surprisingly good listen, despite the odd reputation it might have. It’s not at all that gory a story after all. Au contraire, it turned out to be more of a psychological thing. It leads you on incrementally and divulges in the deep thoughts of the several characters, whom all are thoroughly outlined. The tale builds up to a predictable climax. For this reason I didn’t hand out this book a 15/15 rating as I did with ‘I am Legend’. Predictability makes a story less interesting. But, a good read nonetheless.

Highly recommended, even for non-believers of the horror-genre.